The release of OpenAI’s o1 preview has sparked a shift in how the industry approaches AI scaling. Traditionally, performance improvements have been driven by larger training datasets and increased model sizes. However, a new paradigm is emerging: inference-time scaling. This approach suggests that increasing compute resources during test time—when a model is generating responses—can significantly enhance its accuracy and reasoning capabilities.
Demystifying o1's Chain of Thought
One of the most common misconceptions about o1 is that it explores multiple reasoning paths at inference time, much like a decision tree. In reality, o1 follows a single chain of thought rather than branching out into multiple possibilities. This means it does not conduct an exhaustive search but instead makes calculated, step-by-step deductions along a singular trajectory. While o1 Pro integrates self-consistency via majority voting, the base o1 model strictly adheres to a pass@1 approach, meaning it commits to the first plausible answer it generates without reevaluating alternative paths.
How o1 Thinks: Process Reward Models
A fundamental aspect of o1’s reasoning process is its use of a Process Reward Model (PRM) during reinforcement learning. This unique mechanism allows o1 to function both as a generator and a verifier, switching between these roles dynamically. By constantly assessing and refining its own outputs, o1 can improve its reasoning accuracy over time, ensuring more reliable answers across different problem domains.
Self-Correction and Backtracking: A Happy Accident?
One of o1’s most remarkable abilities is its capacity to backtrack and self-correct within a reasoning path. What’s particularly fascinating is that this capability was not explicitly programmed but instead emerged as a natural consequence of increasing inference-time compute. However, it’s important to note that the effectiveness of extended reasoning time varies depending on the nature of the task—while complex math and coding problems benefit greatly from deeper reasoning, simple factual questions (e.g., “What is the capital of France?”) see little to no improvement.
Berry Training: The Secret Sauce Behind o1's Intelligence
To develop o1’s reasoning capabilities, OpenAI employs a highly sophisticated data generation system known as “Berry Training.” This approach uses a Monte Carlo-style process to create diverse answer trajectories for each problem. Each trajectory represents a unique chain of thought, with some sharing common starting points before diverging into distinct solutions. Over time, this results in an immense dataset composed of hundreds of trillions of tokens—providing a rich training ground for o1’s reasoning engine.
Filtering the Best: Functional Verifiers and ORM Pruning
Not all generated reasoning paths are useful. To refine the model’s understanding, OpenAI utilizes functional verifiers and Optimal Reward Models (ORM) to filter out weak or incorrect answers. While PRM plays a role in guiding the reasoning process, ORM ultimately dominates the final selection, discarding the majority of generated data. These verifiers function like independent “sandboxes,” assessing whether a given answer is mathematically sound or logically consistent before it is accepted into the model’s learning process.
The Infrastructure Challenge: Scaling AI Reasoning
Training an AI model like o1 isn’t just about feeding it data—it’s also a massive infrastructure challenge. The training process requires balancing workloads across GPUs and CPUs, with functional verifiers often running on CPUs due to their inefficiency on GPUs. This has led to varying GPU-to-CPU ratios in the latest hardware configurations, influencing how different AI companies approach model training. OpenAI’s infrastructure must support billions of forward passes, requiring an unprecedented level of computational efficiency.
The Compute Hunger: More Than Just Training
Unlike traditional AI models, where pre-training is the most compute-intensive phase, o1 flips this paradigm. Post-training compute requirements for reasoning models now exceed pre-training demands. This is because o1’s final model undergoes rigorous verification, with multiple large-scale models running in parallel to ensure accuracy. The transformation from a base model to a full-fledged reasoning model demands even more compute than initial training, marking a significant shift in AI development strategies.
Speed vs. Scale: The Future of AI Training
The rapid evolution of AI means that iteration speed is just as important as scale. Traditional training cycles took months to complete, but reasoning models require shorter, more frequent cycles to refine their accuracy. OpenAI’s Orion model, for instance, broke the norm by extending training beyond the usual three-month period. However, the industry is shifting toward faster, iterative training loops to maintain competitive momentum, making agility a key factor in AI advancement.
Conclusion: The Next Frontier in AI Reasoning
OpenAI’s o1 model represents a paradigm shift in how AI systems process and refine information. By leveraging structured reasoning, PRM-based self-verification, and large-scale data pruning, o1 offers a glimpse into the future of AI reasoning. As hardware and algorithms continue to evolve, we can expect even more sophisticated models capable of deeper, more nuanced problem-solving—pushing the boundaries of what AI can achieve.
VE3 is committed to helping organizations develop advanced AI solution. We provide tools and expertise that align innovation with impact. Together, we can create AI solutions that work reliably, ethically, and effectively in the real world. contact us or visit us for a closer look at how VE3 can drive your organization’s success. Let’s shape the future together.